As questão refere-se ao texto destacado a seguir.
If there is any doubt about the persistent power of
literature in the face of digital culture, it should be
banished by the recent climb of George Orwell’s 1984 up
the Amazon “Movers and Shakers” list. There is much
that’s resonant for us in Orwell’s dystopia in the face of
Edward Snowden’s revelations about the NSA [...]. We
look to 1984 as a clear cautionary tale, even a prophecy,
of systematic abuse of power taken to the end of the line.
[...]
However, after “THE END” of his dystopian novel
1984, George Orwell includes another chapter, an
appendix, called “The Principles of Newspeak.” Since it
has the trappings of a tedious scholarly treatise, readers
often skip the appendix. But it changes our whole
understanding of the novel. Written from some
unspecified point in the future, it suggests that Big
Brother was eventually defeated. The victory is attributed
not to individual rebels or to The Brotherhood, an
anonymous resistance group, but rather to language itself.
The appendix details Oceania’s attempt to replace
Oldspeak, or English, with Newspeak, a linguistic
shorthand that reduces the world of ideas to a set of
simple, stark words. “The whole aim of Newspeak is to
narrow the range of thought.” It will render dissent
“literally impossible, because there will be no words in
which to express it.”
Fonte: Frost, Laura. http://qz.com/95696. Adaptado.
Acesso em agosto de 2019.
De acordo com o texto, em geral, os leitores do clássico
1984, de George Orwell, dispensam a leitura do apêndice
da obra porque
a) não foi escrito pelo próprio autor.
b) acreditam se tratar de mais um longo texto acadêmico.
c) sua leitura não altera a compreensão da obra.
d) foi escrito após a publicação do romance.
e) sua autoria é desconhecida.
Como observado no trecho:
“Since it has the trappings of a tedious scholarly
treatise, readers often skip the appendix.” é possível
afirmar que os leitores do clássico 1984, de George
Orwell, dispensam a leitura do apêndice da obra
porque acreditam se tratar de mais um longo texto
acadêmico.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário